Introduction
When we think of a monster, we often envision a grotesque and horrifying creature. However, in literature, the concept of a monster can take on a more complex and nuanced meaning. In this article, we will explore the character of the narrator in various literary works and examine in what ways they can be considered a monster. Whether it be through their actions, motivations, or psychological makeup, the narrator can indeed be most clearly a monster. Let’s delve into this intriguing topic and uncover the layers of monstrosity within the narrator.
Actions
- The narrator’s actions can reflect their monstrous nature in various ways.
- Manipulation: Many narrators manipulate those around them for their own gain, often at the expense of others. This manipulation can take on different forms, such as deceit, coercion, or emotional manipulation.
- Violence: Some narrators engage in violent or cruel behavior, whether it be physical, emotional, or psychological. Their actions may cause harm or suffering to others, indicating a monstrous disposition.
Motivations
- The motivations driving the narrator’s actions can shed light on their monstrous nature.
- Selfishness: Many narrators are driven by selfish desires, placing their own needs above the well-being of others. This self-centeredness can lead to destructive and monstrous behavior.
- Obsession: Some narrators are consumed by obsessions that drive them to extreme and harmful lengths. Their single-minded pursuit of their desires can reveal a monstrous obsession.
Psychological Makeup
- The narrator’s psychological state can offer insights into their monstrous character.
- Psychopathy: Some narrators exhibit traits of psychopathy, such as lack of empathy, remorse, and manipulative tendencies. These traits contribute to their portrayal as a monstrous figure.
- Delusions: Certain narrators may be plagued by delusions or distorted perceptions of reality, leading them to act in ways that are harmful or monstrous.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: What are some examples of narrators who exhibit monstrous traits?
A: One example is the narrator in Edgar Allan Poe’s “The Tell-Tale Heart”, whose obsession drives them to commit a heinous act. Another example is Humbert Humbert, the narrator of Vladimir Nabokov’s “Lolita”, whose depraved and predatory nature is evident throughout the novel.
Q: Can a narrator be considered a monster if their actions are justified?
A: While the concept of morality is subjective, narrators who engage in harmful or destructive behavior, regardless of their rationale, can still be viewed as monstrous due to the impact of their actions on others.
Q: Are there narrators who exhibit monstrous traits but are sympathetic?
A: Yes, there are instances where narrators display monstrous traits but elicit empathy or understanding from readers. This complexity adds layers to their characterization and raises questions about the nature of monstrosity in literature.
Q: How do narrators differ from traditional monstrous characters?
A: Narrators often possess psychological depth and complexity, offering insights into their inner thoughts and motivations. This makes the portrayal of their monstrosity more nuanced and multifaceted than traditional monstrous characters.
